Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(3)2022 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1765787

ABSTRACT

At the core of medicine is the idea to help fellow human beings by improving or even restoring their health [...].


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Humanities , Humans
2.
J Med Ethics ; 2020 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1546560

ABSTRACT

The upcoming Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use (Regulation), which will replace the current Clinical Trial Directive at the end of 2021, has triggered a significant reform of research ethics committee systems in Europe. Changes related to ethics review of clinical trials in the EU were considered to be essential to create a more favourable environment to conduct clinical trials in the EU. The concern is, however, that the role of the research ethics committees will weaken in at least some of the Member States because the new Regulation allows narrowing down the scope of ethics review as compared with the currently valid Clinical Trial Directive. Although the new Regulation may lead to faster approval procedures for clinical trials, which is especially relevant in the context of pandemics, high-quality ethics reviews integrating methodological aspects of a clinical trial should nevertheless be ensured. To maintain high research ethics standards as well as to foster measures to mitigate potential negative consequences of the reform, it is therefore of vital importance to start debating and sharing the reflections about the potential consequences of these transformations and trends as soon as possible.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL